|
Printable version |
From: | "dsproul" <dsproul@corsairmarine.com> |
Date: | Sat, 8 Dec 2001 10:17:05 +1300 |
QUOTE HW:
"The basis of Phaedrus' argument here is the "efficient markets hypothesis"
which is a tenet of economics theory but is increasingly
questioned by economists, particularly practical economists who get to grips with the real world." QUOTE THE
ECONOMIST:
[The Economist, August 19th, 2000] -------------------------OOOOOOOOO------------------------ QUOTE HW: "I don't see any evidence of the TA
investors actually examining the QUOTE PHAEDRUS: "I stumbled across this very good
article comparing fundamental and technical -------------------------OOOOOOOOO------------------------- AND FINALLY- QUOTE FROM ARTICLE RECOMMENDED BY PHAEDRUS: "Buying a stock based on the fact that a stock is fundamentally undervalued, alone, is the trading and investment equivalent of driving at high speed on the wrong side of a major highway, heading into the oncoming traffic and screaming "I'll be fine, I'll be fine - I am driving a safe car"! One way to get the best of the fundamental and technical analysis worlds is to use a hybrid approach. Fundamental analysis can be used to identify 'value' stocks, for example, however the decision to buy them is only made when an appropriate technical signal is given. Of course, you have to somehow conduct, or obtain, accurate and current fundamental analyses of a wide range of stocks. " -------------------------OOOOOOOOOO------------------------- WHAT'S THE
PROBLEM? |
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Sproul;David FN:David Sproul EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:dsproul@corsairmarine.com REV:20011207T211703Z END:VCARD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/
|