Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - November 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: Re: [sharechat] The politics of envy.


From: "Nick Kearney" <nickk@quicksilver.net.nz>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 07:15:39 +1300


As I said before, 'ramping' is a fallacy.  No-one, and no group of people, is or are bigger than the market!  Simple as that.
 
Cheers
----- Original Message -----
From: nick
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [sharechat] The politics of envy.

          Gerry , you were the one who reopened the thread!!
  For the sake of harmony it might be better if this issue
       Ramping is an interesting topic which needs to be bought
into the open, rather than swept under the carpet. However, we
cannot conduct it here as many posters slip into personal abuse.
      I would like to state here that i have no personal anomosity towards you
whatsoever,  however i thought the activities being carried out by yourself
and the GO PDT gang needed to be bought to the attention of the group.
You yourself also needed reminding that organised ramping is against the law.
 Im sure none of us would like to see your messages being sent on
prison notepaper.
        My own support of Frucor has always been very strong and my
support is now being rewarded.  However i only tried to inform not
to persuade. I believe you too started this way with peptech, good
spotting by the way, great run up for he stock.
         We both share a common passion, the stockmarket and i hope
at the end of the day we can put our discussion aside and concentrate
on finding more winning stocks.
  Nick
 

I take it that you normally read the Forum posts and hence, I
don't know why you come up with your post that late at night, when there is no staff around: It was mentioned that this r. thread should stop:
 
 
It seems to me that you are reopening this thread against instructions and want it to bring it to the fore again.
 
You are a poster from this site:
 
I am more concerned with other matters:
I can only hope these people with that many names( clones) on your chat site will now have to surrender the surplus names.
 
Many people on your site either encouraged flaming ( some of it may yet turn out to be defaming or abuse ) or did nothing, while this was going on for a long time!
 
 Many thought it a joke. True kindergarten stuff as one of your posters said! I admire him!
 
It was said that the scene at times  was one resembling a pack of dogs on the loose!
I admired some of the juniors, who protested. Where were you?
 
Suggest you read your Administrator's rules once again. They were designed to combat " flaming". I can tell you now that the standards of this Sharechat site are so much higher!
 
Don't take it too hard if your post on the other channel  was not read or answered. It did not ask for my comment anyway! As I said any posts discussing r. were stopped, you are just too late! 
 
Unlike others with narrow self interests, I am also working for the Forum and am extremely busy.
 
It is for that reason that I am not available to answer any more posts from another site: I can spent my time in a more productive way.
 
Please convey my greetings to "Dimebag" and "Techie".
They don't follow the herd!
 
Gerry

Replies

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: RE: Re: [sharechat] The politics of envy. George Hill
Previous by Date: [sharechat] Daily ShareChat News Summary The ShareChat Team ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: RE: Re: [sharechat] The politics of envy. George Hill
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: [sharechat] The politics of envy. nick ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]