Forum Archive Index - September 2001

["G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz>]

The NTA is supposed to be $ 500 mill. Even if that were the number 3 weeks ago, I would ignore it.

 

I was given to understand that liabilities exceed assets. Is that correct? Have all costs associated with separating Ansett from AIR, been recognized?

 

I won't accept that AIR is running at a profit in present conditions. 

 

I could accept that some tourists from Australia may want to fly with Qantas rather than with AIR.

 

There still could be a case being made for AIR to recompense the Aus. unions. A small chance perhaps, but nevertheless it is there!

 

If there were bonusses paid to Directors, shareholders should demand - in my opinion - the return of same!

 

Gerry