Forum Archive Index - August 2001

["tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz>]

Hi Group,

Following this prodding in a private e-mail from Gerry
>
> 
>Is it possible to summarize the progress made so far in the
>discussion of the screens used to indicate a possible worthwhile
>investment?
> 
>I think that the investor would welcome that as it would enable
>him/her to directly apply the FIG's findings without having to
>wade through a lot of discussion.
>
>
 I have attempted to summarize just where the Focus Investing Group 
has got to so far.   It is a lengthy summary so rather than post it 
again here, I suggest that those readers who are interested make 
their way over to the Focus Investing Group to find it.

Before you all head off there I will make one disclaimer.  The Focus 
Investing Group is in no way suggesting that the FIG criteria are 
the be all and end all of 'good investment'.   We are attempting to 
look at investment in the 'Warren Buffet Style', but this is not to 
say you cannot do well by using at a completely different style.

As an example 'Rubicon' would probably fail all of our initial 
screening focus investing criteria.  Yet there is no doubt that those 
who got in on the ground floor have found it a spectacularly 
successful investment.

So 'properous investing' to you all, whatever your style. SNOOPY






---------------------------------
Message sent by Snoopy 
e-mail  tennyson@caverock.net.nz
on Pegasus Mail version 2.55
----------------------------------
"You can tell me I'm wrong twice, 
but that still only makes me wrong once."


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.