|
Printable version |
From: | "Michael Gore" <michgore@paradise.net.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:25:52 +1200 |
Yeah Malcolm, I think I might have got out of bed on the wrong side too. Sorry for that. I notice I seemed to get more hot under the collar about it than David did!! There are definitely two sides to this one, just like in any market. Have a good day, Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Breadmore, Malcolm" <BreadmoM@anz.com> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:14 PM Subject: RE: [sharechat] Property Vs Shares > Michael > As a matter of fact I did get out of bed on the wrong side, and agree that I > was quick of the mark. I certainly don't want to put anyone off as all > discussion on this forum, on these topics should be actively encouraged. > > I am pleased however that this has raised so much feedback on this subject, > and getting the multitudes of opinions from the chatters was enlightening as > always. > > > Some points to note: > House prices are still going up. Check all accurate reality statistics. > All my investment properties are highly geared and are positive cashflow. > This means that even if there is no capital gain, my assets are still > growing because someone elses money is paying them off. > I am a chartist at heart (go Phaedrus) and regard historical trends highly. > Housing is still in an up-trend. I can't pick the tops or the bottoms, but > with housing, I won't wake up one morning and find house prices have dropped > 10% over night as we often do with shares. Housing charts are not volatile. > So anyone that does a little bit of analysis can spot any danger signs > quickly. > How much effort goes into property management??How much effort goes into > analysis of shares?? Big question with lots of variables, but the more time > you spend, the better your return is.... the general rule of both investment > vehicles. > Remember even if the value of an investment property goes up 0% over > inflation, and you have a positive cash flow paying off the principle part > of the mortgage...you are still gaining capital. > > > > regards Malcolm (disc own property and shares....prefer property :) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Gore [mailto:michgore@paradise.net.nz] > Sent: Friday, 22 June 2001 5:26 > To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz > Subject: Re: [sharechat] Property Vs Shares > > > Malcolm, > Did you get out of bed the wrong side this morning??? Your treatment of > David is harsh and a little unfair I think. New contributors to this forum > need to be encouraged not flamed. There is no need to start off with "I am > amazed at your ignorance on this subject". Some points of your own could be > scrutinised. Firstly you say that someone has to own the houses whether it > is you or an investor. Surely though an investor will be much more cold > blooded about the price to pay for a prospective property and will not pay a > premium for the feeling of owning your own place like many homeowners. You > say "I don't think so" in response to David pointing out that rate of home > ownership here is comparable to Kenya and Bangladesh. So where are YOUR > figures?? True you make a valid point regarding the growth in value of > houses since 1987 compared to the NZSE but with an eye to the future not the > past, David has pointed out that many potential first home buyers are now > leaving tertiary education with significant debt and baby boomers may just > be selling out of their 4-5 bedroom homes in the next couple of decades. > These are NEW developments to consider which haven't been a factor in the > residential property market until recently and which you ignored. You say > there are a lot of self serving people in this forum actively pumping their > own interests. Sure this has happened but I haven't noticed much certainly > not lately. Mostly seems to me there are some very generous people in here > sharing information and ideas. I hope David continues to contribute. > regards Michael > P.S. We need "newbies" in this forum. Many an ignorant newbie including > myself has asked a silly question which has sparked of intelligent debate by > experienced contributors to the edification of everyone. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Breadmore, Malcolm" <BreadmoM@anz.com> > To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:44 AM > Subject: RE: [sharechat] Property Vs Shares > > > > David > > > > I am amazed at your ignorance on this subject. You seemed to have done a > wee > > bit of research and from that research drawn completely incorrect > > conclusions. > > > > 1. Someone has to own the houses whether it is you or an investor...they > > need to be owned. > > 2. If you don't own them, an investor must own them. If an investor buys > an > > asset they need a return on their dollar. Up goes rent. > > 3. You compare us with Kenya and Bangladesh.....I don't think so > > 4. The median house price in NZ has dropped in the last couple of > > years.....last couple of years. Tell me what was the NZSE40 back in 1987 > > 4000+ what is it now 2000 (do the math on this one)......and what was an > > average 3 bedroom home worth back in 1987 and what is it worth now????? > > 5. Would you buy shares that were performing badly??...no. Nobody in their > > right mind buys property the preforms badly either. As an investor you > would > > only buy an asset that has a low cash flow if it has a high capital gain > > potential...Just like shares. > > 6. Your point about NZers not being able to afford homes is catch 22. They > > must then rent homes. Investors love this. Have you seen the cost of > housing > > in other well developed nations????? You will be surprised as to the > amount > > of "up-side" to go in NZ yet. > > 7. Shares are risky...so is property. The higher the risk the higher the > > return. But I would prefer to throw a dart at the property press and buy, > > then throw a dart at the share market and buy.....I know which would be > more > > "risky". > > 8. Have you being reading this forum for long?? There is some great stuff > in > > here and there is also a lot of self serving people that actively pump > share > > prices up..just so they can sell. IT HAPPENS IN EVERY INVESTMENT CATEGORY. > > Everyone hopes for a bigger fool sometimes. You job is to weed out the > hype > > and make sensible investments that suit you own criteria. > > > > Short sighted people annoy me too. > > > > Malcolm Breadmore > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Mitchell [mailto:david_mitchellnz@yahoo.com.au] > > Sent: Friday, 22 June 2001 6:00 > > To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz > > Subject: [sharechat] Property Vs Shares > > > > > > I was pleased to see the recently released taxation > > proposal recommended taxing home ownership. I support > > this idea because I believe too much of our countries' > > capital is wasted in residential property, as opposed > > to the economic growth which could be generated by > > investing in growth industries. > > > > I believe this is one of the reasons why the standard > > of living in New Zealand has declined VS OECD > > countries over the last two decades. It is a > > well-known fact that New Zealand has a high proportion > > of home ownership, however, I think many people would > > be > > surprised to know that other countries with a similar > > high proportion of home ownership include very poor > > countries such as Bangladesh and Kenya. No doubt this > > has somthing to do with a lack of investment in > > economic development. > > > > I have never understood the attraction in residential > > property as an investment, (however I have no problem > > with purchasing it as a form of consumption). For > > example, using REINZ statistics, the median house > > price > > In New Zealand has fallen from $153,466 in January > > 1998 to $133,766 in May 2001, and these figures aren't > > even adjusted for inflation!! Also, the rental return > > of residential property, in major centres, is only > > around 3% to 6% before expenses such as rates, with > > investors relying on capital gains to justify their > > returns. But as has been shown, there is no capital > > gain, only capital loss!! Another thing that puts me > > off property is that the interest to pay for your > > first house is not tax deductable, whereas if you > > borrow to invest in business or shares, it is. > > > > Some of the major demographic trends occurring in New > > Zealand do not bode well for property. It is predicted > > that New Zealand's population will be stagnant > > over the next century, along with all other developed > > countries, so where is the growth in demand for > > housing going to come from ? I also saw recently in > > the > > media that around 10% of New Zealanders owe $4 billion > > in student loans. Because of this burden, many people > > will delay, or forgo altogether the purchase of > > a house. Another frightening scenario for homeowners > > in the baby boom generation is that this group has > > planned to pay for their retirement by releasing the > > equity in their home, perhaps all at the same time. > > This will have disastrous consequences for the > > property market. > > > > Well, I am a younger person who has recently completed > > uni, and I never intend on buying a house because I > > think it is a very undiversified position to be in. I > > much prefer shares because of the higher returns and > > ability to diversify. One argument is that you can't > > borrow money to invest in shares like you can in > > property, this is in fact wrong because you can > > through margin lending at similar interest rates. > > Another argument is that shares are too risky, however > > let's say you own a house near where you work and your > > firm goes out of business, affecting the local > > economy, affecting house prices. So you've lost your > > job and money in your house in one blow. How > > undiversified and risky is that !! > > > > The media says that around 70% of New Zealanders' > > assets are in residential property. 70% of our funds, > > sitting around doing nothing, hoping for a greater > > fool to buy it. Wake up New Zealanders, this is why > > our wealth is declining as shown in the Westpactrust > > Net Wealth surveys. The majority of us are borrowing > > overseas currency to buy something which is declining > > in value, employs no one and creates nothing. This is > > one sure method of wealth destruction. This is stupid, > > and New Zealanders should be discouraged from this > > behaviour through taxation. > > > > So it annoys me when short-sighted guys, protecting > > their own interests, like Rex Hadley of the REINZ say > > things like "We are encouraged to see the leaders of > > all the major political parties rule out this radical > > proposal" > > > > David Mitchell > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > _ > > http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger > > - Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more! > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market > investors > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market > investors > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|