|
Printable version |
From: | David Mitchell <david_mitchellnz@yahoo.com.au> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:37:49 +1000 (EST) |
Here are my arguments Malcolm Breadmore, 1. Yes, I agree someone has to own the house, but this doesn't mean they are not overvalued or that vast majority of the people who own them are under a major economic illusion. 2. Why does the rent have to go up ? I'm not sure about the rental market in other centres however I look at my local paper in Christchurch and see two whole pages of houses for let. There is a major oversupply. Also the major demographic users of rental housing, the 20 to 30 year olds is a shrinking proportion of our population. 3. I am not comparing the NZ economy with Kenya and Bangladesh. I am comparing the level of home ownership. 4. You and I both know that shares outperform property. Sure, the NZSE has had a dismal record but what about the ASX, NYSE, S&P500 ? 5. Yes I agree investors want the best returns, but I believe the property market is overvalued because there is a large group in NZ who are still under the illusion that residential property is bulletproof asset. It has treated them well in the past and they continue the behaviour this way without regard to changing demographics and inflation. 6. The lack of affordability of houses may increase the number of renters, OK. This will increase the rental return of the houses. But people buy houses for their capital gain, that is their major selling point. People who are on high tax rates buy houses to make a cashflow loss to offset tax, they buy them for thier capital gain. The lack of affordibility will correct the market with house prices falling with lack of demand and rentals increases with more renters. After this correction, I believe that housing will become a more attractive asset to own. Ian, I agree diversification is possible in property, but only if you have alot of money and are prepared to travel. What I mean by undiversified is that, say you are just starting to build an investment portfolio. You can go into residential property using say $30,000 for a downpayment buying a $100,000 house. All of your portfolio is then tied up in that asset in 21 Joe Bloggs Ave, NZ. The city and country where you live and work. Using the same $30,000 you could borrow $70,000 through margin lending and spend $100,000 on maybe 10 different shares. Maybe stocks in NZ, Oz or overseas. The point is it is very difficult and time consuming in property to invest in Oz or overseas. Also you can't buy $5,000 of 44 Smith St, Christchurch, $5,000 of Johns Lane, Auckland etc etc. If you live in your own house, it is under the same economic risks that you are directly under. David Mitchell _____________________________________________________________________________ http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger - Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
Replies
|