Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - June 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] Goodman Fielder comparison


From: "Peter" <pmaiden@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 07:31:57 +1200


Paul - if still interested in Goodman Fielder here is a piece from this weeks  'Business Review Weekly'
 
Cheers
 
Peter
 
Does Goodman Fielder have a future?
14 June, 2001
 

Long-suffering is an inadequate way to describe the shareholders of Goodman Fielder.

Over the past decade or so, they have watched Australia's largest food manufacturer stagger from one crisis to the next, all the time pushing its share price to new lows. Time after time, just when the bad news appears to be over, another profit downgrade, management change or cost blowout is unveiled, and Goodman shares take another tumble.

Over the past week, Goodman's share price hit a 15-year low, as the company downgraded its 2000-01 profit and announced more than $170 million in abnormal losses and provisions for the year. At the same time, Goodman defended its decision earlier this year to reject a takeover offer from Pacific Equity Partners (PEP). PEP offered $1.60-1.70 a share. Goodman directors did not take the offer to shareholders, and have not explained why. Goodman shares are currently around $1.10.

On June 7, Goodman directors hired an executive-search firm to find a replacement for chief executive David Hearn, who joined the company in September 1995 and has failed to find a way to lift its revenue, profit and share-price performance.

What is wrong with Goodman? How long have you got? The company's key problems – which existed when Hearn joined and have not gone away – include:


  • Too many of the product categories in which it competes are commodities, such as edible oils, and milling and baking. In the margarine market, for example, Goodman continues to engage in price wars that destroy profit margins, undermine the power of its brands, and reinforce to consumers the message that price is the only product differentiator in the category.

  • Constant restructuring and writedowns have made it impossible to predict Goodman's earnings with any certainty. The current abnormal losses and provisions are largely the result of bringing forward restructuring costs that would have been incurred over the next three years.

  • Goodman continues to break its promises. In announcing the $170 million in abnormal losses and provisions, Hearn said Goodman would achieve double-digit earnings growth in 2001-02. Goodman shareholders have heard such optimistic predictions in the past, and no longer believe them.

  • A consistent failure to develop higher-margin products. Goodman has scored some hits in recent years with new products that deliver fatter margins, but most of its products are low-margin goods, competing in categories where retailers – not manufacturers – have the pricing power.

Goodman is currently valued at around $1.4 billion, or 30% below its estimated break-up value. The company is worth more dead than alive. Its directors should seriously consider euthanasia.

Does Goodman Fielder have a future? Not in its current form. For shareholders, the only acceptable future for Goodman's various divisions is as subsidiaries of other companies.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] LEARNING TO INVEST: List of recommended books Teddy Wu
Previous by Date: [sharechat] SGI update Will Bryant ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] LEARNING TO INVEST>>>Focus Investing Group (1) tennyson@caverock.net.nz
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Goodman Fielder comparison Gary Rountree ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]