|
Printable version |
From: | "nick" <helmett@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 26 May 2001 06:36:57 +1200 |
The small dip in Frucors shareprice just before the crash could of been caused by a number of factors. Could be that the previous buying of the preceding weeks dried up as people waited for the announcement. As we know on this occasion the news was bad and the chart was vindicated. However, if the news had been good, the chart would of indicated a sell just before the good news. For every chart like this one there are many more that give false indicators etc. I regard charts rather like horse racing systems, it is easy to come up with a system which will make a profit based on past results. hwever there is no proof they can foretell the fiuture. This is what is written in the herald today,by their financial advisor. Maybe charts work maybe they dont, but just because a chart is right dosent necessarily mean it couldnt just as easily been wrong. 'These people are chartists. They reckon they can tell what will happen to a share price based on patterns in charts of its past performance. any people have tried to do this over decades. Sometimes, a pattern seems to hold for a while. But, just when you put money on it, it doesn't any more. Why on earth should it? Share prices are set by many people trying to assess how well a company will do in the future. I also don't know of one academic researcher who has shown that chartism works. And many have looked into it. " My own view is that charts do have value, simply because so many people use them that they create a self fulfilling prophesy effect nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|