Hi Nigel,
You are totally correct with your calculation.
However, you need to consider other aspects of RBC in relation FFS share
price.
For example, you need to put some value on
other assets of RBC which, on the book worth about $100M. Say, for
argument, lets discount it by 50% to $50M. This equates to $0.14 per RBC share
and with FFS share price at $0.31, RBC should be valued at
0.14+0.31*1.4=$0.57, as opposed to its current price of $0.43.
So, there is considerable upside to RBC share price
even if FFS remains unchanged.
Cheers
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 10:12
AM
Subject: Re: Re: [sharechat] FFS and
RBC
Okay, someone's gonna have to spell this out to me. The figure of
1.4 has been calculated, and the statement made that for every 1 cent increase
in FFS, RBC will increase 1.4 cents. Am I reading that correctly?
If so... how does it work?!
FFS current price = 31 cents. If this price doubles, eg a 31 cent
increase, FFS will be priced at 62 cents, a 100% return.
Imagine I bought into RBC at 45 cents. While FFS increases by 31
cents, RBC will have increased by 31x1.4=43 cents. Its new price would
be 88 cents, only a 95% gain - still great, but not as good as FFS
alone. Porobably I am completely missing the point here, but I
thought that the relative worths of each share would depend on the extent of
improvement of FFS price, and of the performance (good or bad) of RBC's other
assets.
Could someone please explain where I'm going wrong!! Why does everyone
understand this except for me?!!!
Cheers,
Nigel.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors
http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
|