Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - March 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] NZ Herald Online Story - <i>Gaynor:</i> Meat - a gristly downside, lean upside


From: ceejaynz@xtra.co.nz
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:37:40 +0000



The following story has been sent to you by ceejaynz@xtra.co.nz who feels it 
may be of interest.


Senders email: ceejaynz@xtra.co.nzMessage: With all the discussion on Meat 
products, thought Chatters might like to read this cautionary note from one of 
the more reliable commentators.
Ceejay

---------------------------


                                                                                
        24/03/01 - <i>Gaynor:</i> Meat - a gristly downside, lean upside By 
BRIAN GAYNOR

The meat industry has been grabbing headlines in recent weeks with BSE (mad-cow 
disease), foot-and-mouth, higher export prices, the shock resignation of Affco 
chief executive Ross Townshend and Richmond's sharemarket listing.

Although a modern economy is supposed to be driven by knowledge-based 
industries, agriculture is still the backbone of ours. 

Meat and meat byproducts account for 16 per cent of the country's merchandise 
exports, in second place behind the dairy industry, which generates 18 per cent 
of overseas trade revenue.

Sharemarket investors used to have a wide range of meat companies to choose 
from. These included Gear Meat, Waitaki Farmers Freezing Company, New Zealand 
Refrigerating, R&W Hellaby, Southland Frozen Meat, Canterbury Frozen Meat, 
Hawkes Bay Farmers Meat, Huttons Kiwi and Fortex.

Most of these struggled to make an adequate return and were placed in 
receivership, closed down or taken over by Goodman Fielder or Fletcher 
Challenge. The two corporate giants left the industry with their tails between 
their legs after suffering large losses.

Goodman Fielder and Fletcher Challenge discovered that meat companies have one 
basic problem: they are high-risk businesses with very low margins, whereas the 
ideal investment is a low-risk operation with high margins.

Last year was a good one for the meat companies, yet their EBIT margins 
(earnings before interest and tax to revenue) were remarkably low, ranging from 
just 2.3 per cent for Affco to a high of 4 per cent for Alliance.

These compare with 2000 EBIT margins of 43.5 per cent for Baycorp, 39.4 per 
cent for Telecom, 22.5 per cent for Sanford, 14.1 per cent for Frucor, 11.4 per 
cent for Montana, 11.1 for Carter Holt Harvey and 10 per cent for Cavalier, to 
list just a few.

The meat companies are middlemen. They don't own the product, they act as 
agents between producers and buyers. 

If there is a sharp increase in export prices because of foot-and-mouth 
disease, market pressure will force them to pass on these benefits to farmers.

The non-ownership of the source product is a major deterrent to profit growth. 
When Hugh Fletcher became disillusioned with the sector, he said he would never 
consider building a pulp and paper plant without controlling the source of the 
raw material, yet that is what happens in the meat industry.

Sanford is a similar operation, yet it achieved an EBIT margin of 22.5 per cent 
in 2000 compared with 2.3 to 4 per cent for the four meat companies. The big 
difference is that the fishing group has direct access to the raw material 
through its quotas.

Another problem facing the meat companies is the high stock financing cost, 
particularly during the peak of the killing season. This has to be financed by 
short-term borrowings, which have a big impact on interest bills.

The net interest cost to EBIT of the four companies range from 26 per cent for 
Alliance to a high of 44 per cent for Affco. By comparison, the net interest 
cost to EBIT of Baycorp, Telecom, Sanford, Montana, Frucor, Cavalier and most 
other companies is well below that of Alliance.

The Warehouse operates in a low-margin sector yet its margins are far higher 
than the meat companies. The company has similar revenue - $1105 million - to 
the four meat companies yet it recorded EBIT of $112.8 million (a 10.2 per cent 
margin) in 2000 and had net interest costs of only $4.8 million.

The discount retailer has huge buying power that enables it to secure product 
at very competitive prices. It has also created strong consumer loyalty through 
effective advertising campaigns and very good shop-floor service. The meat 
companies have limited capabilities in these areas.

The problem with a low-margin business is that there is little scope for error. 
But the meat industry is high-risk and prone to a number of mistakes. 

The companies have a huge exposure to both the real and derivative foreign 
exchange markets. A mistake in this area can be very costly.

They can sell product forward but they might have to purchase stock from 
farmers at a higher price if the wrong decision is made.

A procurement war can force them to pay too much for stock.

If there is a drop in international prices companies might have to write down 
their stock levels at year-end. This can have a negative impact on earnings.

Although meat companies have a number of factors running against them, 
well-managed companies that avoid mistakes can make a good return to 
shareholders.

The two large South Island companies, Alliance and PPCS, are cooperatives. The 
North Island-based companies, Affco and Richmond, are stock exchange listed.

Affco was established in 1903 but took a big leap forward in 1986 when it 
bought the Whangarei and Taumarunui works from R&W Hellaby, and four years 
later, the Waingawa, Waitara, Longburn, Wairoa, Feilding and Imlay plants from 
Waitaki International. 

These purchases, mainly financed by debt, were a disaster. In the four years to 
September 1994, shareholders' funds crashed from $163.1 million to a negative 
$23.9 million as the group accumulated losses of $180.9 million.

The 1995 share float was a recapitalisation of the group, with all $50 million 
raised going to the banks.

Affco started listed life on a good note with EBIT of $37 million for the 
September 1995 year. But since then it has been on a very rocky road. A 
negative EBIT of $61.5 million was recorded in 1998 because of low 
international prices and a domestic procurement war. 

The Taumarunui, Waitara and Whangarei plants were closed. 

EBIT recovered to $23 million in 2000 but it is still well below 1995 and 1996 
levels.

The directors' attitude at last month's annual meeting was surprisingly upbeat. 
But less than a week later the company announced that chief executive Ross 
Townshend had resigned.

Meat company chief executives usually depart when problems have developed; 
Affco's previous chief executive resigned just before 1998's huge loss was 
announced. Mr Townshend had little incentive to leave - he was paid $460,000, 
116 per cent more than the next highest paid meat company chief executive.

Has Affco made a mistake on the foreign exchange market? Did the company sell 
long this year and get caught by the sudden increase in export prices? 
Investors will want to know the answer to these questions before they commit 
further funds to it.

Richmond was a non-processing exporter until 1974 but in the past 15 years it 
has bought Dawn Meats, Pacific Freezing, Hawkes Bay Farmers Meat, Lowe Walker 
and Waitotara Meat to become the largest of the four companies in terms of 
revenue.

Under the astute leadership of chief executive John Loughlin it has avoided the 
industry's pitfalls but it is still a low-margin company in a high-risk 
industry.

Richmond is forecasting EBIT of $40.2 million and an EBIT margin of 3.1 per 
cent for the September 2001 year. A projected net profit of $19.4 million will 
give earnings per share of 47c and a dividend of 10c has been forecast.

At $2.40 the company has a prospective price/earnings multiple of only 5.1, one 
of the lowest on the sharemarket. This will attract some investors, but 
Richmond will have either to raise margins or be a consistent mistake-free, 
low-margin operator if it is to attract long-term investor support.

* Disclosure of interest: none

* <a href="mailto:bgaynor@xtra.co.nz";>bgaynor@xtra.co.nz</a>

<a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?reportID=57543";>Herald 
Online feature: Dialogue on business</a>
                                                                                
        
 

---------------------------

To view more stories please visit the NZ Herald Online at 
http://www.nzherald.co.nz



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
http://www.netbroker.co.nz/        Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] AIRVA G Stolwyk
Previous by Date: Re: Re: Re: [sharechat] What to buy? >> Forest shares or RBC? >> An opinion G Stolwyk ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] NZ Herald Online Story - <i>Gaynor:</i> Meat - a gristly downside, lean upside Derek
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] RMG Investor Interview online now G Stolwyk ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]