Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - March 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] re : Barbara (FFS & FFSPA) - Shame & Double Shame on Regular Sharechatters


From: "Ben Dutton" <bendutton@sharechat.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:16:35 +1200


David, in defence of forum members, sometimes questions do not get answered
because people miss them, expect someone else to answer and then forget
themselves, and sometimes answers are actually mailed to that person's
private email address instead of the forum address (not sure if this would
have been the case with Barbara's question though).

It's great that you provided the answer to her question - thanks.  Yes,
maybe your calls of "shame" will promote some more participation but that's
perhaps being a little harsh when considering the aforementioned points.

The ShareChat forum has been having some excellent contributions of late,
and it's great to see some new names popping up with interesting things to
say.  I'm certainly enjoying it, along with our thousands of other visitors.

Keep up the good work everyone - I'm looking forward to more
thought-provoking and valuable posts from the online investor community that
is ShareChat.

Best Regards

Ben Dutton
MD, ShareChat Ltd


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Ling" <seechoke@hotmail.com>
To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 9:50 AM
Subject: [sharechat] re : Barbara (FFS & FFSPA) - Shame & Double Shame on
Regular Sharechatters


>
> There is only one basic difference between the two classes of FFS shares -
> in the event of liquidation, preference shareholders get their money back
> first (if there's any left over after paying creditors)before the ordinary
> FFS shares.
>
> I am astounded that Barbara has had to ask regular sharechatters twice b4
> she gets a reply to her question.
>
> Seems like none of the regulars could be bothered. I thought that
sharechat
> was to enable all and sundry to communicate and obtain some help from the
> acknowledged 'grey' headers chatters ...
>
> Obviously, I am wrong - they are there to promote their 'fantastic'
> knowledge about investing in the market ...
>
> Great attitude.
>
> Like I say, shame & double shame.
>
> Barbara, next time - just ring up the company (FFS) or your local
financial
> advisor.
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market
investors
> http://www.netbroker.co.nz/        Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join
now.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
> http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
http://www.netbroker.co.nz/        Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] Daily ShareChat News Summary Ben Dutton
Previous by Date: [sharechat] British Investment Trusts and others G Stolwyk ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: RE: [sharechat] re : Barbara (FFS & FFSPA) - Shame & Double Shame on Regular Sharechatters Mick Clifton
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] re : Barbara (FFS & FFSPA) - Shame & Double Shame on Regular Sharechatters David Ling ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]