|
Printable version |
From: | "Peter Maiden" <pmaiden@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Mar 2001 07:57:07 +1200 |
So S&P are concerned about the level of
Contact's dividend, relative to profitability.
One question that has never been answered over
years of debate is why do companies, not just Contact, pay attractive
dividends when they themselves carry large levels of debt.
In essence Contact have borrowed the $100M odd
they paid out in dividends in December.
Doesn't make sense - but a problem that
financial experts and economists have grappled with for years.
Sharechatters have any thoughts?
Cheers
Peter.
In addition to
|
Replies
|