|
Printable version |
From: | "DR" <kat47@bigfoot.com> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:05:44 +1200 |
RNS Number:9551A
Guinness Peat Group PLC 23 March 2001 23 March 2001 GUINNESS PEAT GROUP PLC ('GPG'or 'the Company') PRELIMINARY RESULT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2000 CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT '2000 was the most difficult year for global stockmarkets since 1990 and reflected the overbought nature of most markets at the beginning of the year' ----- Merrill Lynch Annual Survey The net profit of #18.7 million appears relatively ordinary but otherwise the year 2000, as a whole, was rather more successful than indicated in pure accounting terms. It was a year of much useful activity and, in the post Tyndall phase, there was a quite high level of reinvestment from which there has not yet been any material return. However, it has created a definite level of added potential for the present and the future. If there is any weakness in the GPG scenario, it is possibly the need to be more vigorous in crystallising and completing a greater number of what is always a wide range of investment projects in the Company's portfolio. This is not to abandon a long term approach but to recognise, in today's market, a demand for more rapid revisions of corporate strategies. Already, in the current term, we have initiated various avenues of 'shareholder activism'which have been on the drawing board for some time and which are referred to later in this report. Without an unlikely first round 'knockout', these initiatives are invariably characterised as 'failures' by the media and analysts but this is a necessary part of the process where sensible and supportable proposals to enhance shareholder value are seldom unrewarded in the longer run. Successful investments are the key to GPG's future performance and among the more significant new subsidiaries, associates and portfolio additions, not previously reported to shareholders are - STAVELEY INDUSTRIES PLC Staveley has been a difficult and unrewarding investment but, as a consequence of a successful takeover offer late last year, it is now wholly owned by GPG. After the sale of the main subsidiary, British Salt Ltd, the residual group comprises some six engineering based manufacturing and contracting businesses in UK and USA. As the problems of the previous regime steadily diminish, GPG is probably not the most logical permanent owner of these businesses but, in the meantime, it has a valid role to support management in achieving consistent profitability and improved capital values. JOE WHITE MALTINGS Joe White has exceeded expectations since we took effective control in March 2000 with a 45% holding. Necessary structural and personnel changes, the sale of the difficult foods businesses and, not least, an upturn in the malt price cycle have all contributed to a much better outlook than for many years past. ENZA So far, less than satisfactory. Prior to the appointment of the new Board, the company was in a worse position than previously known, with possible severe repercussions for New Zealandapple and pear growers. GPG has contributed a disproportionate level of input relative to the absolute size of our investment (18% of the capital with a book value of #1.8 million) but which we accept, within reason, as our contribution to the rescue of an important national industry. Enza can become a large (Year 2000 sales of NZ$800 million) and successful organisation if industry politics embrace a greater sense of unity and commercial logic. WRIGHTSONS Not a major investment (#3.3 million at cost) but a timely one, insofar as improved performance has reflected a morebuoyant New Zealand rural economy. The market value of the shares is now 80% above our entry price. OTTER GOLD Another difficult situation where the adverse legacies of the previous convoluted ownership structure have lingered on. The recent cash issue has lifted GPG's holding to 44% and provides funds and greater proprietorial focus to extract the best value from the company's three gold mining ventures. TOMORROW LTD This arises from a reconstruction of Mid-East Minerals which has reduced GPG's ownership from 88% to a fully diluted 36% of the enlarged company. Tomorrow is not a 'technology' stock in its own right but an investor in distressed situations in that sector where additional funding is considered likely to produce a credible commercial result. --------------------------------------- GPG's other subsidiary and associated companies are Canberra Investment Corporation (69%), a Canberra based residential land developer with a solid, if unspectacular, earnings record and good asset strength and Turners & Growers (45%), one of New Zealand's oldest and most respected corporate names, which has made a most valued contribution to the group. GPG's largest portfolio investments are Coats Viyella plc (12% at cost, #38 million) and Inchcape plc (16% at cost, #37 million). Coats is the world's leading thread manufacturer and was once one of Britain's major industrial concerns but its textile operations including fashion labels 'Jaeger' and 'Viyella', have been severely impacted by the steady decline of the UK manufacturing industry. An exciting and worthwhile challenge for GPG's recently appointed Board representative! Inchcape is another historic British Empire trading house but nowadays is a much smaller company operating exclusively in the motor trade (it contains a significant portion of the former TKM, an important subsidiary of BIL in the 1980's). In our view, Inchcape's international model is no longer appropriate in the modern age and considerably greater value would be obtained by realising the strategic value of its individual components. The present Board of Inchcape does not share this view and the debate continues in the current term. Other major investments are De Vere Group (5%, at cost, #18 million) and Brickworks (10%, at cost, #20 million). These two companies could not be further apart in geography and industry but they share a common characteristic of intrinsic value well in excess of market capitalisation and requiring serious structural reform to release that value to shareholders. A badly directed company with good assets may be a little harsh, but is nevertheless a succinctdescription of De Vere. It owns a mix of prestige hotels, budget accommodation and leisure facilities in the UK which GPG proposes should be split into separate corporate units. This will happen eventually (if De Vere is not taken over in the meantime) but at present the 'synergy' card has not yet been played out to exhaustion. During 2000, GPG made a takeover offer for Brickworks which was unsuccessful at that time but we retain complete confidence in the ultimate outcome of this investment. The Board's capital and dividend proposals for this year are: * A cash dividend of 1.0p per share (an effective increase of 10%) * Reinstatement of the scrip dividend alternative * The 8th successive 1 for 10 bonus issue. (An investor who purchased the equivalent of 100 10p shares in the 1991 placement at an effective cost of NZ90 cents and who took no subsequent action would now hold 195 shares at a cost of NZ46c each. In reality, cash issues and scrip dividends would have reduced the cost to less than 40c.) * Serious consideration was given to offering shareholders another series of redeemable convertible notes on terms similar to last year's issue. However, it was decided preferable to conserve the company's administrative and financial resources for a very full program of investment activity during the rest of the year rather than the diversion of non essential capital adjustments. The year 2001 will be a critical one for GPG insofar as the Company has never been better placed toachieve a strong combination of realised profits, higher asset backing and the momentum for continuing gains in the future. Ron Brierley CHAIRMAN23 March 2001 D.
|
|