|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:42:26 +0000 |
G Stolwyk wrote > >I am not too keen on the word "experienced" investor but like Hugh >like Hugh Webber, don't like airlines. > So your analysis might be uncharacteristically biased? > >All over the world they tend to have very erratic earnings. > ...which is built into the share price > >And I don't like AIR ( Air New Zealand ) >because of Brierley involvement! > Yes there is certainly a potential overhang in the market for AIRVA because of all those 'A' shares Brierley still holds. > > Unlike other airlines they did not hedge the oil price when it was > so low @ $US 10-20 ! > Possibly a high risk strategy so that cornerstone shareholder Brierley Investments can get a better price for the B shares they sold to Singapore Airlines, as per the 'top up' arrangement? Looks like it might have backfired. > >They now have a new CEO, he may be able to do something but there >are heavy costs. > >I thought that they had paid too much for Ansett and it is becoming >clearer, that they did so ! > Yes, Selwyn Cushing, the AirNZ Chairman, is on record as saying so. > >Another one - in my opinion - is 'the Aussie factor':They tend to be >far more parochial and hate their companies to be owned by >foreigners. (Some Aussies will disagree with this thought.) > >Therefore, I feel that the ticket price has to be lower than that of >Qantas before they would use another airline. > I'm not sure about that. I think Ansett is still identified as an Australian Brand, the new chief executive is Australian, and he proceeding to 'Australianise' the senior management too. > >As you know there were problems with Ansett planes due to poor >maintenance. That is not normally the case. It may indicate that >there were management problems as well. > Agreed. The Air NZ fleet is now surprisingly modern, and in relative terms the Ansett fleet is old and tired. An older fleet needs more maintenance which must be properly planned for. > >In my opinion, they could be running close to - or even at a loss >for some time. You need to check as to the ownership of planes. >Normally, they would lease some as well. > >If they own quite a few, then depreciation charges will be high.( >Most likely they will tend to lease more when there is little cash >flow ). > I disagree completely. Airliners are bought and sold on the international market in US dollars. So with the decline in the New Zealand dollar you may find that the market value of the planes has *appreciated* in value over the past year. There may be no depreciation at all, despite what nominal figures the accounting standards make AirNZ put in the books. On the other hand with leased planes, the leases are paid for in US dollars. It is the leased planes that will be the drag on the cash flow (kiwi Dollars coming in, US dollars going out). Not the other way around. > > I have indicated in Forum that their debt levels tend to be high. > They " fix " this with a cash issue coupled with some more > borrowing. > > AIR will most likely need refinancing. > Their covenant with their Bank(s) may prescribe refinancing should > the share price fall below a certain level. > There is a mooted convertible note issue, already approved by shareholders that should take care of that. > > Another cash issue is not likely as the price of new stock will need > to be set too low to be acceptable. In any case, the market will > not accept another so soon after the last one! > > I think that right now AIR will be approaching the Government and > arrange for Singapore to take an increased stake in AIR. > > Singapore could dictate any terms !! > I don't think the situation is as cash desperate as you imply. Air NZ are still paying an interim dividend of 4c per share. > > I don't think that I would hold AIR in these conditions. > > I could be wrong but in your case I would sell as soon as the > exchange opens!! > Considering you don't know with what objective the original poster bought the shares, I feel your advice is a bit extreme Gerry! I think the original poster's question was more along the lines: 'Yes I know that Air New Zealand has problems, but there might be a point where all these problems are built into the share price and it becomes a countercyclical 'buy'. The question is, has it reached that point?' My impression from the Air NZ AGM, is that management expected the oil price to decline and the $NZ to $US exchange rate to rise over the last few months. Aviation Fuel has come down in price a bit but the exchange rate has remained stubbornly low. My hunch is that AirNZ has continued their largely unhedged policy and have got it wrong. Given the volatility of both oil prices and the exchange rate this could change quickly. But frankly with more upheavals in the Gulf, I don't expect much change in either the oil price or exchange rate. Given flat, minimal profi, business conditions I can't see much upside in the share price in the short term. But I don't see much downside either. If the final dividend matches the interim this will be 8c per share or 5.3% yield based on AIRVA at $1.50. That is OK compared to what you can get in the bank. Myself, I am going to hold. I think the upcoming covertible note issue (if it happens) might be a good way to indirectly get into AIRVA too, but I'm not shelling out more cash for more AIRVA shares directly, just yet. SNOOPY disc: Hold AIRVA (for income) and AIRVB (for income and some growth) --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "You can tell me I'm wrong twice, but that still only makes me wrong once." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|