Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - February 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] FORCE-SKC-25cps-A joke????


From: Phil Eriksen <phil@acepay.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:27:43 +1300


Greg McDonald wrote:
> 
> I see SKC's offer of 25cps for FOR as opportunistic and will likely be
> scoffed at by most FOR holders.
> 
> Who in their right mind would sell out at what is a historic low
> price....????
> 
> SKC obviously see the unrealised value in FOR that the market does not
> currently realise.They want it at a firesale price-problem for SKC the
> fire was extinguished last year and this year should certainly be an
> improvement.
> 
> I have some advice for SKC-double the offer and we may be in the same
> ballpark.50-60cps and we maybe have a deal.
> 
> Until then,sling your hook-I'm not biting.....
> 
> DISC-hold FOR

As I read the announcement, they have committed to buy the shares held
by P.Francis.  The Chairman wants out - at a historic low price, as you
say.  Why?

Cheers,
Phil


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
http://www.netbroker.co.nz/        Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] A letter to Mr Pickup at Tourism Holdings ashbb
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] A letter to Mr Pickup at Tourism Holdings Ian Andrews ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: Re: [sharechat] FORCE-SKC-25cps-A joke???? Greg McDonald
Previous by Thread: Re: [sharechat] FORCE-SKC-25cps-A joke???? Chris Castle ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]