|
Printable version |
From: | "G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:00:24 +1300 |
Hugh,
G: Are you
buying the 2000 operating system and programs from Microsoft? I
noted a large quantity of security bulletins coming through lately.
H: I have the impression that Bill is pushing these
systems and that his staff does not do enough testing.
Sure, there are new viruses coming through all
the time but I am not spending a lot of time applying virus controls to my
98,2nd edition and then having to start all over again with the 2000
version.
G: The public seems to think the same and the Micr.
shares are sliding.
H: By the way, how did Will Bryant get on with
the sale (to readers) of the internet fire
extinguisher?
G: I don't know, I heard that he got some
on special for new readers to buy.
H: Back to shares, why does
some literature give results in average instead
of compound returns? It is very confusing!
G: Quoting average returns should be outlawed!!
An average return of 20% over 5 years
corresponds with a compound return of 14.9%!
The sophisticated client will think in
compound interest terms; unless the word
'compound' is used, he/she must accept that the word
'average' is applied and that the result requires recalculation
to obtain the 'compound' rate.
Sometimes the 'average' is used to get an advantage
over a competitor's result (which was expressed as a
'compound' rate).
The client may not be sufficiently focussed to
notice that or does not know how to do the recalculation.
H:I must leave you: I am busy hanging
hemp curtains; they cost some $ 5000 but I got them very
cheap!!
Gerry
|
|