|
Printable version |
From: | "Colin Ross" <ceejaynz@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:10:18 +1300 |
Thank y, I've reiterated my comments today. Ceeajy ----- Original Message ----- From: Ben Dutton <bendutton@sharechat.co.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 1:58 PM Subject: Re: [sharechat] Re: Eldecare > Hi Kelvin, > > I was tapping out a mail describing the competitive pressures the whole > retirement sector faces, but Mark took the words out of my mouth. > > I should probably add that about a year ago, many brokers and analysts were > over-exceedingly positive about the industry - we heard the usual story, > what a massive market the baby-boomer generation will be for future > retirement villages, etc etc. > > However, I think many overlooked just what a competitive industry it really > is - think of how many advertisements there are out their for private > retirement villages and home-care services. > > I pulled up an old post from Colin Ross (hope you don't mind Colin) because > it's a piece of "insider information" so to speak on the situation that > these company's face: > > > Subject: Re: [sharechat] Eldercare > From: "Colin Ross" <ceejaynz@xtra.co.nz> > Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 17:19:09 +1200 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > I've been pondering on this subject for a while now, and would like to share > my thoughts with the group. > I have recently retired from over 40 years experience as a retail Pharmacy > Proprietor. During that time, I had a good deal to do with Retirement homes > and similar facilities. > There has been a long period in the past where government subsidies > provided profitable opportunities for Retirement Home providers. > However, during the more recent past the generosity of these provisions > have been reduced to the point where margins have become very tight, many > operators have been forced out of business, and the survivors have needed to > become very "efficient" which has often resulted in inferior services, > employment of cheapest possible labour, and a general squeeze on contractor, > Doctors, Pharmacists, etc.. > Eventually, there may well be a market for User-pays services, but right > now, the public has a contrary mind set. > In my opinion, the Corporate providers will have their work cut out to > become profitable. Hard working owner operators are managing to prosper, but > they need to be very good at it and extremely hard working. > I am certainly very pleased to have extricated myself from this quagmire... > Ceejay > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Still though, even though the situation doesn't look the best for > retirement-care, I find Eldercare's change of business direction interesting > (as detailed in their announcement - check Phil's post to have a read). It > means that the management realise that if they are to become a profitable > and strong company, they have to diversify. > > This could be positive in the long term and, if you are a long term holder, > you may well be rewarded. > > Best Regards > > Benjamin Dutton > (Disc. do not hold ELD) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Hubbard" <mhubbard@es.co.nz> > To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 1:29 PM > Subject: Re: [sharechat] Re: Eldecare > > > > > > > >No Replies, Someone must have an opinion please. > > > , I have Eldecare Shares av..451, I am along term holder, > > > > this company was a brokers buy some time back is there something I > don't > > > > know or is this a great time to top up. Latest price..168 nta is .22c. > > > > Comments please. > > > > > > Hi Kelvin > > > > Eldercare, Metlifecare, and Ryman all operate in an exceedingly > competitive > > area, and growing more so, which would imply pressure on future earnings. > > Its also subject to govt. regulation to an uncomfortable extent in my > > opinion - re subsidies, etc. My personal favourite in this sector is Ryman > > (although I have now sold all my shareholdings in this). I like Ryman > > because they build as well as manage their own resthomes, thus, more > > diversified revenues, lower cost structure? Also, this company has kept to > > all of its profit promises since listing (well largely anyway). Thus, if > > you're dead set on this sector, perhaps think of Ryman rather than > > Eldercare - Ryman's shareprice is also down historically. > > > > IMHO anyway. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market > investors > > http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join > now. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|