|
Printable version |
From: | "Ben Dutton" <bendutton@sharechat.co.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 1 Dec 2000 08:48:04 +1300 |
Forum members - sorry about this - please ignore and delete the messages. I have unsubscribed the person and hopefully we won't get any more messages like this appearing. Best Regards Benjamin Dutton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terisa Frost" <terisa@stanfordjames.co.nz> To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 8:39 AM Subject: Re: [sharechat] US Markets/Interesting Article > Hi there, > > Please email this direct to Sheldon sheldon@stanfordjames.co.nz and note > that anything that comes into my email for it will not be forwarded to him. > Thanks. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ben Dutton <bendutton@sharechat.co.nz> > To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> > Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 7:20 AM > Subject: [sharechat] US Markets/Interesting Article > > > > As I write the Nasdaq is down 6% and the Dow is down 2% - it's definitly > not > > a good day on the US markets - lets hope that the NZSE can continue to > > resist (on the whole) following Wall Street's drops... > > > > This article showed up in my inbox this morning from the ever reliable Red > > Herring magazine - check it out - it certainly makes for an interesting > > read. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Benjamin Dutton > > > > > > PERSONAL CAPITAL: PERSONAL CAPITAL: Capital at risk > > > > It's not a pleasant time in the market... or is it? > > > > If you're looking to turn a quick buck as a day-trader, it's > > a terrible time in the market (unless you're adept at > > selling stocks short). But for a real, long-term technology > > investor, things are getting interesting. > > > > Remember back in the early 1990s, when not every investor > > was a technology investor? Back then you could pick up Cisco > > Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) with a price-to-earnings ratio of 30. > > Well, it would be nice to see such values again -- and the > > more the bubble deflates, the closer we get. > > > > This year's massive, painful, and volatile correction in > > many young technology companies is a by-product of Wall > > Street's rush to take companies public. The massive assembly > > line of IPOs churned out over the last two years flooded the > > market with young, inexperienced, and unprofitable > > companies, and a lot of inexperienced investors gobbled them > > up. Many of these companies were completely incompetent or > > had terrible business models. Others were simply not ready > > for the public markets. > > > > This column was started on the premise that the market was > > turning into a risky public venture market. That type of > > environment demands a closer, more analytical look at > > specific vertical technology fields. As clumps of technology > > companies in specific markets go public earlier in their > > life cycle, investing gets more risky, but the potential for > > huge returns is also still there. > > > > THE PUBLIC VC MARKET > > Years ago, an emerging market would have dozens of players > > funded by the venture community. These companies would fight > > tooth and nail for market share and profitability -- in the > > private market. Then, after several years of creative > > destruction in the market, Wall Street would consider taking > > them public. > > > > In the last two years, we saw an elimination of the later > > stages of the IPO process. Wall Street stripped out the > > requirement for profitability -- or in many cases, even the > > requirement for revenue -- and took the companies straight > > to the market. You had dozens of companies going public in > > the same market, with no prior weeding out in the private > > market. > > > > In my mind, this all culminated in July of this year, when > > Corvis (Nasdaq: CORV), a promising optical networking > > technology company founded by former Ciena (Nasdaq: CIEN) > > founder David Huber, went public without any revenues and > > certainly no promises of profit on the near horizon. The IPO > > was really a $1 billion venture capital round, funded out of > > the wallets of public investors, at a valuation that would > > make any real venture capitalist cringe. Wall Street quickly > > bid Corvis up to a $37 billion market cap within a week. > > > > Corvis's market cap is now $9 billion, as the stock has > > fallen more than 75 percent in just four months. This IPO, > > more than any others, is a symbol of the extremes tested by > > Wall Street. After the recent correction, the market has > > become more selective. Will we return to only taking > > profitable companies public? Probably not. But reckless and > > greedy IPOs with irrational valuations have been put on > > hold. > > > > In the venture market, risky and turbulent company life > > cycles are the norm -- a company, as it evolves, goes > > through fits and starts, customer wins and losses, and an > > evolution in management and culture. If the companies blow > > up, or need help, the VCs and other investors become > > involved. But such investors are accustomed to large amounts > > of risk, and they build portfolios that are hedged against > > such risk with a "one in ten" philosophy of funding enough > > companies to hit at least one grand slam out of every ten > > investments. The average investor cannot afford to assume > > that much risk. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > A D V E R T I S E M E N T > > > > >From the hottest IPO to the latest market trends, you won't > > find more extensive business and financial news on the web > > than by signing up for Individual.com, the personalized FREE > > service that lets YOU choose what's news. > > Register at Individual.com now! > > > > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2005797;4971958;y?http://www.individual.com/re > > gistration?mc=%m&plcmt=DC-%esid!-%epid!&adcode=%eaid! > > > > A D V E R T I S E M E N T > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > WHAT NOW? > > In the first leg of the correction in April, we adjusted our > > attitude toward this new wild-west public market with the > > new new rules. One of the rules was that an unprofitable > > company (and certainly one without revenues) should never be > > valued over $10 billion. Another was that if an investor is > > not able to diversify the portfolio and play several > > companies in the same technology spaces, you're better off > > sticking with bonds or mutual funds. > > > > What you have seen in the market this year is the negative > > aspect of that risk -- young, fast-growing but inexperienced > > companies can collapse back to earth just as fast as they > > sailed into orbit -- all it takes is one sticky quarter. > > Take Cacheflow (Nasdaq: CFLO), one of the companies I've > > written about, as a recent example. Its quarter was deemed a > > disappointment. A rocket ship up, and a lead balloon down. > > Surprising? Not really. Painful? Sometimes. But necessary > > for the evolution of emerging markets. The company still has > > the same potential, but Wall Street's hacked it down for its > > short-term bobble. > > > > So, what now? Largely, what we are seeing now is an across- > > the-board valuation reality check. When Wall Street gets > > gloomy, it dwells on risk and becomes increasingly > > pessimistic. Remember that the market is very shortsighted. > > You should keep your eye on a two- to three-year time frame. > > > > Can the Nasdaq go to 2000? Possibly. Will it go to zero? > > Definitely not. The market should begin the healing process > > by the first quarter of next year. Of course, it would help > > the process along if the country avoided a civil war and > > picked a new president. And history says that the > > probability of the Nasdaq rising to new highs within the > > next five years is extremely high, barring a complete > > collapse of the U.S. economy. > > > > FOLLOW THE LEADER > > Many of the companies closely followed by Personal Capital > > were picked because they were emerging as leaders in > > developing technology markets, and they were also leading > > hot trends. For example, BEA Systems (Nasdaq: BEAS) was > > gaining momentum in the componentized Web application space. > > Companies such as Extreme Networks (Nasdaq: EXTR), Sycamore > > Networks (Nasdaq: SCMR), Ciena, Juniper Networks (Nasdaq: > > JNPR), and Redback Networks (Nasdaq: RBAK) are leading the > > charge in next-generation networking gear. > > > > JDS Uniphase (Nasdaq: JDSU) and SDL (Nasdaq: SDLI) are > > gorillas in the optic components space, and their valuations > > are finally reaching attractive proportions. Micromuse > > (Nasdaq: MUSE) maintains its lead in the field of > > telecommunications network management. > > > > Another sector to watch is communications chip makers. Many > > of these companies, such as Xilinx (Nasdaq: XLNX) and > > Broadcom (Nasdaq: BRCM), were the first to get slaughtered > > in the correction, and they are thus likely to be the first > > to recover. Xilinx, which has seen its profits grow at a > > rate in excess of 80 percent and is now trading at a P/E > > ratio of 21, looks downright cheap. > > > > With the IPO pipeline shutting down, these companies I > > mentioned, most of which are already profitable, will get > > stronger as the upstarts will need more time to raise > > capital and catch up. That's why we should now get back to > > the basics of technology investing, and look for the > > profitable leaders in the public space to extend their > > leads. > > > > RECENT LIGHT READING NEWS STORIES > > > > * Patent points to Corvis secrets > > http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=1586 > > > > * Cyras: what, us worry? > > http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=1616 > > > > * Ciena spooks the market > > http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=1603 > > > > > > - R. Scott Raynovich > > rayno@lightreading.com > > > > * R. Scott Raynovich, former investment editor of > > Redherring.com, is executive editor of Light Reading > > (http://www.lightreading.com), a global site for optical > > networking. He has covered technology markets for more than > > seven years. * > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > RELATED LINKS > > * Personal Capital: The new new rules. > > http://www.redherring.com/investor/2000/0406/inv-pc040600.html > > > > * What's Corvis's secret? > > http://www.redherring.com/investor/2000/0810/inv-pc081000.html > > > > * Fish or Cut Bait: Fiber-optic frenzy. > > http://www.redherring.com/investor/2000/0731/inv-focb073100.html > > > > * Previous Personal Capital: Get ready for broadband. > > http://www.redherring.com/investor/2000/1116/inv-pc111600.html > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Discuss today's column in the Personal Capital column discussion: > > http://boards.redherring.com/WebX?13@^2342@.ee6c58e > > > > or check out forums, video, and events at the Discussions > > home page: > > http://www.redherring.com/discussions/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > FREE email newsletters from Redherring.com! > > > > Want insight into the hot IPO market, long-term investing > > strategies, future technologies, stocks to watch, venture > > capital funding, and more? Get FREE email newsletters in > > your inbox from Redherring.com, with the insight, analysis, > > and opinion to help you make more strategic business and > > personal investing decisions. Subscribe today. > > > > > http://www.redherring.com/jump/om/i/business/rhcom/global/subscribe/47.html > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > SPECIAL OFFER on RED HERRING magazine! > > > > Stay on the cutting edge of technology -- subscribe to Red > > Herring. By taking advantage of this special offer, you'll > > pay only $39 for a total of 24 issues and SAVE 67 percent > > off the cover price! New subscribers only, please. > > > > https://www.redherring.com/service/circ/subs_WT.html > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market > investors > > http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join > now. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|