Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - November 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] Double bottoms..Warner


From: "Tony Haddon" <haddon@E3.net.nz>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 20:07:11 +1300


You will have read that double bottoms are among the most reliable patterns i guess warner...I have never looked out for them because a) my software will not "explore" for them, I have to do it manually/visually and b) you can get into the usual bottompicking smelliness by imagining a double bottom developing and cunningly pre-empting it......I prefer obvious trends, particularly here and now.c)There's the usual question of time frame..ITC has definitely started crabbing on daily chart, but it still doesn't look too hot on  weekly chart. d) for my money  picking head & shoulders can be a bit subjective..optimistic eyeballs create a lot of mischief...eg I can't see any in your examples  !! None of them excite me yet..e) Reliable patterns need decent trading volume, rather than kiwi dribbling.. For some real excitement look up the chapter on cup & saucer......my limit with patterns are common or garden triangles, and for the speccies of old, retracements.
All IMO  ..I'm not one of Hugh's goat entrails men, to me a chart is as good a way as any of keeping track of share trading data, and I'm sure  even the aformentioned h wouldn't buy a stock without comparing current price with yesterday's or last week's..
 
Rgds,    Tony Haddon

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] Shareholder associations overseas do good work P Maiden
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] ASX-Sharechat sites. daniel ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] Double bottoms..Warner Warner Lamb
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] Shareholder associations overseas do good work P Maiden ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]