|
Printable version |
From: | Brian Gale <brigale@i4free.co.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 02 Oct 2000 12:48:17 +1300 |
Following on from previous postings by Sarah, Peter and Steve some interesting points are raised and in particular ' Are Chatters perhaps concentrating too much on the wrong categories ?' I would suggest that securities, broadly speaking, fall into three categories:- 1. Sound companies with steady performances, good dividends. No spectacular cap gains but no great falls either. Can be classed as boring but provide steady profits to investors. 2. Special or recovery situations, more speculative but could produce good capital gains 3. What are commonly called ' penny dreadfuls ' Highly speculative usually at low price per share Of these it is 3 that seems to receive the most attention from Chatters. Firstly I think the low $ price is an attraction - a 10 cent share only needs to go up 1 cent to make a 10% profit and of course you get a bigger bundle for your $ outlay. There is the hope to get rich quick and impatience for results, so if the 'pd' performs smiles abound, however because of the spec nature of this category the chance of a drop is probably greater than a gain ( people get scared of these stocks very easily and down she goes) But again this tends to be the most exciting category because of the inclusion of the so called glamour stocks.hence the attention received. Looking at category 1....... Out of a total of 49 Top 40 securities some 21 have shown an increase, or at least didn't fall during the 9 mths to date Ten show a Cap gain of 10% or better. The Top40 Index itself fell nearly 10%. MON,BCH,WHS,INL,ANZ,UNL,WPTCA,TTPGC,TLT,GPG,SKY,LNN,NCH,TRH,AMP,AIRVB,KIPVB, FAP & FFS-FEG which are really cat 2. It would seem that these should form the backbone to a portfolio but there is the danger of Cat 3 becoming dominant for the reasons stated. If you wish to see the full listing for the Top40 it is appended as a spreadsheet. I haven't analysed the SCI index which would include the 'pds' , but I will. BG
Replies
|