|
Printable version |
From: | Phil Eriksen <phil@acepay.co.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Sep 2000 07:15:32 +1200 |
Marilyn Munroe wrote: > > Here I was tapping out a missive on how my low spec computer was just > fine for me when the damn machine hung. Not even <Ctrl>+<Alt>+<Del> > would work, and so I had to reboot loosing the text of my e-mail. > > The incident has changed my thinking on computer specs. Maybe what we > crave is stable software. Maybe we think if we we give the software > more processing power and more memory to play with it will not betray > us as often. Certainly stable software is what people *should* be craving, but while many say that is what they want, their actions do an injustice to this. Four common things (but there are others) stand firmly in the way of stable software : (a) It is easier to hire on site support staff than top quality programmers. Quite often the software just "gets written" with little emphasis on bug fixing, design and intuitiveness partly due to (b) "first mover advantage" being seen as important, despite the fact that in most olympic endurance events i've watched in the last week, the guy that speeds out fastest does nothing more than inspire the others to keep on running, while eventually running out of gas when it counts - its the same with software, unless it works, and if you did it too quick, it won't. (c) clients often see little value in stable software, and battle with the concept of paying for it. While people can see "value" in a freshly recruited consultant spending 3 hours onsite fixing a problem, they can't "see" neither the cost or benefit of taking 5 times as long on the software to ensure the consultant isn't needed. Of course, the costs and benefits are huge - spend much more upfront getting it right, but after that, save this 3 hour trip 5000 times, and we're talking massive savings for the client *and* decent returns for the software co, *if* you can get paid for doing 5 times as much work on the software. All that is required is for the clients to demand and expect stable software, and be prepared to pay a little more for it. I can understand peoples thinking tho - they have been trained to ring up and "pay for support" - they should be dealing with companies where they pay to NOT ring for support. (d) its very hard to say no to people, and no matter how well software was "planned" people always want more. If you are not careful, the beast WILL take on a life on its own, and your simple little system will quickly become half a dozen modules, with every feature you could imagine, but with none of the personality, stability or intuitiveness that made it a winner initially. Finally, I spent 12 hours this weekend (and another person spent 12 with me) basically doing house cleaning on our computers. (we're not talking many computers, either) Years ago, I insisted on knowing everything I could about my computer, what files were there, what each file did etc. These days alas, its way down the priority list and the exercise was interesting. We were having no real hassles with the computers, however, behind the scenes there were a whole heap of things that while functional, weren't quite right. Performance on all computers is now significantly better - even tho we did nothing magical, and there were no real problems to start with. Go figure, huh. My point is, from a consumer point of view you can't do much about software and hardware other than trying to choose the right stuff from the right people. What you can do, however, is try and learn a little more about it all, and do your housekeeping (its easier to preach than practice - damn near killed me :> ). Not talking major stuff - perhaps scandisk, defrag etc, make sure your root directory isn't full of documents, virus checker isn't 6 years old, there arn't zip files all over the place etc. I suspect this was "second nature" 10 years ago, but these days I often wonder how many people bother to do it. Cheers, Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|