|
Printable version |
From: | "tennyson@caverock.net.nz" <tennyson@caverock.net.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:13:50 +0000 |
> >If you analyse the value of your shares according to accounting >principles then they have a value every moment that the market is >open and there buy orders active. This is the immediate >(existentialist perhaps?) value of the shares. > > Yes > > >However value is a concept which transcends the immediate 'price' of >the share. Whenever you buy a share you are effectively saying that >the value of the share is not the current price. This value exists >as a 'belief' in the mind of the person holding the share. The only >time the two intersect is when a share is bought or sold. > > I am being semantic here, but I would argue that the value is the price. What is cash, if it is not a reflection of value? When people are buying 'value' shares though, they are really buying 'future value'. Actually that's not quite right either as the instantaneous share price today often *is* a reflection of future value in discounted cash flow terms. Investors buy because their perception of future value is different from that of the market. > > >For those unwilling to believe that there is a future value to which >the price is leading - you have made a loss. But to those who have >the faith to believe - the value is as yet undetermined. > >Sacramental economics. > > I can't agree with the religious analogy. I am not saying that share prices cannot be influenced by sentiment. But underlying that the value of a company is largely determined by future prospects. These prospects are tangible and can be measured in dollars and cents. No 'faith' is required. > > >Either way you lose until you find someone who believes the value >is higher than you do. > > If you are a trader that may be so. But if you are an investor you are raking in the dividends while you wait. I would hardly call holding something like RBD and getting paid 12% just to sit on your own money a 'losing' position. SNOOPY --------------------------------- Message sent by Snoopy e-mail tennyson@caverock.net.nz on Pegasus Mail version 2.55 ---------------------------------- "Q: If you call a dog tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?" "A: Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
References
|