|
Printable version |
From: | "Ian Andrews" <iandrews@ihug.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Sep 2000 07:51:59 +1200 |
I don't have a quarrel with WNC employees or the
businesses they are engaged in - a previous post I said the WNC businesses are
"believable".
Insiders are generally understood to be directors
& people acting in the function of a director, even if called
otherwise.
The issues complained of by me centre on
whether the company deals fairly with its shareholders as a whole &
between shareholders individually.
As I said before, I consider the shares speculative
& I do have a small holding (in my personal speculative
portfolio) . The potential for profit in this type of portfolio comes
more from market perceptions of & expectations for the businesses than
fundamentals.I'm watching the Radio spectrum auctions on www.med.govt.nz with interest to see when Jump
will "jump".
Therefor, we don't
regret selling the [Family Trusts] 2.5% holding in WNC, where we were
counting on fundamentals. We happily contributed $30,000 in the 1998 rights
issue & bought shares onmarket to get company off the ground - ( &
encouraged many others to also contribute at the time) We were largely attracted
by the Cobb & Co business ( which WNC is not doing nearly as much with as it
could be) The corporate governance issues which became proven to us after
the 1999 AGM made it an inappropriate vehicle for that size of investment for a
Family Trust; & we sold down between October & May.
|
|