|
Printable version |
From: | "Warner Lamb" <cloud9@i4free.co.nz> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:17:20 +1200 |
Brian, good to have you back. I read the article too. Dont you think bottom picking is the same as trend picking anyway only trying to be a little earlier..still based on sentiment or your current feelings. eg A few bottom pickers got TEL on Friday at $6.40-$6.42, does the trend picker now buy at $6.91 after two up days...no thanks, Ill sell at $6.99. and take my 9%. I think its trying to put people into baskets and although I would tend to be a "bottom picker" and like getting oversold stock, I would still take sentiment into consideration. Telecom may be a bit volitile in the meantime but longer term 3-5 years I see it over $10. Same with CEN, tried to bottom pick at $2.52 with intent to hold, no uptrend but there is always a point where you say, this is a good entry. If TEL had slipped below $6.40 I would have been prepared to buy all the way to $6. I would rather use this strategy than wait for an uptrend. Same for RMG, I would buy down to 30c then say goodbye if it slipped into 20s. This arguement would be a classic example with RMG and BCH. The "bottom picker" and the "trend rider" Which horse you are riding now probably would answer the Q. The comment "ride the trend until it ends" seems to be as risky as try to pick the bottom. Sometimes knowing when to get off is harder than getting on! R Warner ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors http://www.netbroker.co.nz/ Trade on Credit, Low Brokerage. Join now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
Replies
|