|
Printable version |
From: | "Matthew Darby" <mdarby@estaronline.com> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:39:07 +1200 |
Hi
Mark Yes,
you are correct, Napster acts as a directory, but all Peer-to-Peer programs
have to have a central server to check things like permissions, act as a
directory to locate information if you want to control the environment you are
in, otherwise you will have the problem of how do you collect revenues from any
file that is sent across the Internet. This is why Peer-to-Peer has enormous potential
as it removes central storage and can monitor permissions and payments. Napster’s
argument is that it doesn’t serve the music but rather directs, this is the grey
area for most. Gnutella
was the first true Peer-to-Peer system developed from the old FTP (File
Transfer Protocol) which was how the Internet was designed to work, the problem
with this back then was personal computers were not powerful enough to support
a system like Gnutella. I think the true value behind Peer-to-Peer is going to
be how we interact with each other on the Internet. You will be able to become
more selective about the information or services you receive and be able to
create small communities (Townships if you like) that will cut out the unnecessary
traffic that we all have to endure from time to time. It will also allow for real
time messaging which could even spell the end of Email, now that would be a
revolution. Kind
regards Matthew
Darby |
|