|
Printable version |
From: | "Jeremy" <jardley@electrosilk.net> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Jun 2000 11:44:34 +0800 |
> From: Oliver Shapleski <oliver.shapleski@vuw.ac.nz> > Absolute fallacy I'm afraid, Jeremy. Nice rhetoric, but how about a worked example for you. Borrow $100K. at 8%. Invest in company for 1 year and analyse the results Case 1 : No Change in share price Company pays 2% dividend, Sell shares Pay back bank $108K, Net result $6K loss. Company pays 8% dividend. At end of year, sell shares, pay back bank $108K Nett result no gain or loss Company pays 10% dividend, sell shares, etc make $2K Case 2 : Share price increases at 1.5 x inflation rate (a rough long term average here) - say 5% this year 10% dividend => $115K - $108K = $7K gain 8% dividend => $113K - $108K = $5K gain 2% dividend => $107K - $108K = $1K loss Case 3 : Share price drops 50% - like many NZ shares in the past 6-12 months $48K - $40K losses All your assumptions, Oliver, are based on the expectation that the market and individual share prices will rise at an accelerated rate well above long term averages. The practical facts are that the NZ sharemarket has no major short term growth potential, and the cost of money is comparatively high now. You also have the prospect of ever increasing interest rates as the dollar falls Synopsis : In a static market as a rational investor you have to expect a dividend return from a company at least equal to the cost of money to buy the shares. In a declining market don't even bother to get out of bed. Assuming the market will rise at a rate well above the long term average is pure speculation and is clearly not justified at present. Jeremy ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.
Replies
References
|