|
Printable version |
From: | "Oliver Shapleski" <oliver.shapleski@vuw.ac.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 24 May 2000 12:28:58 +1200 |
Thought some people might need the flaw pointed out
to them - hence the problems with NTA. FFS has debt - true. This
debt is a negative on the balance sheet to the full extent of the debt.
Possibly $700m, I don't know (I reiterate my point made a few months
back - which letter stock actually "owns" the debt is in many circumstances
unclear).
If a profitable company bought FFS, the value of
the debt isn't necessarily -$700m. It depends entirely on the applicable
tax laws, but if the transaction is structured to allow Loss Carry Forward and
the tax rate is 33%, then the value of the debt increases by 700m*0.33 i.e.
roughly $230m.
People need to consider tax implications a
bit mote thoroughly. Few investment analysts have any idea - they
don't understand any of the law - leading to many different valuations and some
of these are very misleading, usually with too much downside.
Oliver
|
Replies
|