Forum Archive Index - May 2000

[Chris <cd@ak.planet.gen.nz>]

Exactly, and I cannot believe the attention this is getting.  We had 
$120m market turnover today and nearly every post since market close has 
related to AQL's piddly turnover, equivalent to the value of a couple of 
decent new cars. 

No, I'm not trying to upset anyone or bait for an argument.  Just think 
it is worth pointing out that there are great opportunities in the market 
if one can look beyond share prices pegged to the price of half a 
snickers bar.
 
Playing the pennies, makes you think pennies and ultimately earn only 
pennies.

Chris.


>The increase in AQL only involved $120439 in total. That is that the share
>price started to move markedly from .07 upwards to .94 BUT there was only
>$120439 spent to drive the price from .07 up to .094 The whole days trading
>in AQL only involved $181107.   With this sort of money involved its hardly
>the sort of activity one would expect from the big boys. Maybe it is a wind
>up by a smart operator ?
>
>MN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.