Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - April 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

RE: [sharechat] RE: AIRVB - Sarah


From: Sarah Corkill <Sarah.Corkill@directbroking.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:28:44 +1200


Hi Derek,

No we don't send emails like this to clients, although we did attempt to
ring as many of our clients as possible that we knew were holding AIRVB
shares.  The lack on notice and the constrained timeframe meant that alot of
shareholders missed out.

Kind regards,

Sarah Corkill
Direct Broking




-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Watt [mailto:dkw@paradise.net.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 April 2000 21:52
To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz
Subject: RE: [sharechat] RE: AIRVB - Sarah


Thanks Sarah,

Does Direct Broking send emails to clients
detailing urgent announcements like the one
this morning?

Best regards,
Derek


At 12:43 PM 4/11/00 +1200, you wrote:
>Hi Derek,
>
>All the shares purchased by ABN Amro were purchased under a special ticker
>code SPEC2.  They purchased 73,330,424 AIRVB shares.  They only require
9.6m
>so these orders will be scaled by the broker and the NZSE.  Brokers are
>still waiting to be told how the scaling will affect their orders.
>
>AMN Amro said they would give preference to holdings of 5000 or less so the
>smaller holders are being taken care of.
>
>Brokers didn't get alot of notice that this was happening so I can't help
>you with getting more notice.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Sarah Corkill
>Direct Broking
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Derek Watt [mailto:watt250@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, 12 April 2000 00:31
>To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz
>Subject: [sharechat] RE: AIRVB & Bob
>
>
>Does anyone know what is going on with AIRVB?
>
>How come there was supposed to be a stand in
>the market at $3 to end at 10:30am when
>according to the access brokerage site
>the shares haven't traded that high today.
>(last checked at 12.08 pm)
>
>They seem to be giving preference to small
>shareholders, but in that case why give practically
>no warning and such a short stand?
>
>Most small shareholders would have missed it
>(including me).
>
>Also why is Bob Jones complaining about this site?
>It's not supposed to be a personality contest!
>(Bye the way, thanks for the e-star analyses Bob)
>
>Bye,
>Derek.
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market
investors
>To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
>http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market
investors
>To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
>http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
>
>

-----------------------------------
Derek Watt
http://members.tripod.com/DKWatt/
-----------------------------------




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] price chart Osbert Sun
Previous by Date: [sharechat] price chart vincent.wang ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] price chart vincent.wang
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: [sharechat] The way things will go down, up, sideways........ Chris Darby ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]