Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - March 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] A few more good stocks - FFS/FOR/GPG...


From: Jane Holland <JaneHoll@netscape.net>
Date: 8 Mar 00 03:42:45 PST


Glad to see some good stocks discussed. Excellent postings Frank (though
personally I have some reservation re BRY - burnt too many times)! May I add
on a few more to the list?

FFS - Huge discount to NTA backing, increasing timber price, Genesis R&D
listing, High Court decision in favour of FFS in declining the injunction
sought by CITIC NZ (Thanks Hugh Webber and John Wedde for taking the
discussion further)

FOR/Ihug - Introduction of Satnet, expansion in Oz market (see Ben's post
earlier), over-sold position and price consolidation at 69/70c

GPG - Huge discount to NTA backing, outstanding 1999 profit, 1 for 10 bonus
issues, increased dividend payment, promising outlook (David Reid's pick)

CEN - Paying a good dividend and price has become so cheap!

...

Can't wait see the action in the morning

RGDS
Jane



____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] A few more good stocks & sharing information frank fernandez
Previous by Date: [sharechat] Big buys of BRY David Thompson ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] Big buys of BRY David Thompson
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] A few more good stocks & sharing information frank fernandez ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]