Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - February 2000

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

[sharechat] AQL would be best speculative buy


From: Robert Nottage <robnottage@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 01:20:46 -0800 (PST)


Les & David,
I fully endorse what you and others have been saying
about AQL tonight but would like to add my little bit
and something that we must not lose sight of - the
fact that AQL's biggest value as a speculative 'buy'
is its value as a "shell" for whatever purpose in the
future. That will be its biggest attraction to
entrepreneurs wanting a ready-made listing on the
NZSE. 
It is interesting to note that apart from Advantage,
all the current other tech stocks on the NZSE (e.g.
ITC, SMR, EPH, SPE, NGL etc) emanated from the shells
of previously divested companies.
And what did their share prices do when the big
announcements were made? In my books, AQL would be the
best "speculative" buy on the NZSE today, and anyone
not having some in their portfolio at the current
bargain basement prices would be dumb loco.
Have a good night. 
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] ITC still rolling downhill Rini H
Previous by Date: Re: [sharechat] stop-losses Rini H ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] No apologies - just an AQL investor, A good call from start to finish + Les Mortimer
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] NOG - Buy Mike Hudson ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]