|
Printable version |
From: | richard hermans <r.m.hermans@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:51:03 +1300 |
BRETT AS YOU ARE A CONFESSED TECHY IF YOU HAD A BIT OF $ TO HAVE A PUNT WITH,HAVING SOLD SOME SHARES WOULD YOU GO FOR ITC,OR AQL???VERY HARD TO GAUGE FROM SOME OF THE COMMENTS ON THIS FORUM I REALISE ITS ALL A GAMBLE BUT ITS ALWAYS GOOD TO HEAR SOMEONES HONEST GUT FEELING??? THANKS FOR YOUR OPINION IN ADVANCE MARGIE Brett & Leeanne Phillips wrote: > > Hi Nigel, > > I must agree, I have been watching LKO for several weeks and also have been > taking special note of their announcements and also comments made on Aussie > Bullboards/Chat forums. > > Firstly I understand the company is presently investigating the potential > of a new oil find within their licensed area.(see announcement > approx-9/02/2000) > > Secondly they are close to confirming a deal which gives them sole "Aussie" > rights to a revolutionary new energy product.(see announcement > approx-7/02/2000) > > And lastly their is also rumor that a major energy company(?) has been > showing a > lot interest in LKO recently.(www.stockhouse.com.au) > > One or even two out of three would'nt be bad. > > I have taken a look at the top 20 shareholder list while visiting their > website and recognise some reasonably major investors > represented.(www.lakesoil.com.au) > There has been good trading volumes in Aussie and apparently some brokers > are suggesting that LKO will be trading in the 15-20 cent range in the > short to medium term. I hope they are correct as I am trying to top up at > just under 6 cents at present. > > I feel sure this stock has potential, although this maybe missed by NZ > investors / traders, (lets hope not,) I would hate to see the Aussies make a > killing > because we're to slow to catch on once again! > > Watch out for further announcements soon, this share from my viewpoint has > much more potental than FRO, even when your technology obsessed like myself. > However if your looking for a great tech stock I can't see how you could go > past dual listed CGB at present.( This company is going global.. and has > real daring & attitude ... and only a small number of shareholders ) > > Technology stocks are still my preference. Tech developments are still in > their infancy, those who believe the bubble is about to burst are just > kidding themselves.(we're still year behind the US and Europe) We are now in > a development transition which has never been witnessed before( the nearest > comparison is the industrial revolution)and this technology driven > transition will continue to evolve indefinitely. Look back 2-3 years, who > would have believed you could buy and sell stocks(live) for instance..on the > internet, while sitting on the beach, using your mobile phone.. and that's > just the start. My small business has saved $100,000 in the past year by > developing it's own costing and accounting system which cost a mere $20,000 > to design and programme (what an investment) and of course we can on sell > also to re cope some of that cost! > > I don't believe we can compare 'good' tech stocks to the property stocks > that caused so much pain in the late 80's. Of course the secret is picking > the good ones.! Good luck! > > Cheers Bret > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors > To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at > http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
References
|