|
Printable version |
From: | Phil Eriksen <phil@acepay.co.nz> |
Date: | Mon, 07 Feb 2000 20:26:53 +1300 |
hugh webber wrote: > > Can't see any immediate shattering news that would have caused it. > Although they're totally unrelated as far as I know they appear to have > dragged > Sausage Software down about 3%.....one of the usual mysteries of human > psychology I suppose. > I think that like Fortune the Sharemarket must be a woman.... No, if it was a woman you wouldn't be able to chat on a forum about its performance, and the only time we'd see any action is every second Friday after it had drank a bottle of wine.. :) As for Solution6, i haven't heard anything about *why* it crashed, but the thing i've noticed is the sheer number of acquisitions they've made. One of the baffling aspects of the sharemarket is how almost any acquisition seems to result in a share price increase. While some acquisitions create great value, I can't go past (a) nobody sells the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, so in almost all cases, the price paid has to be higher than true worth, or the business must have features that limit its future growth/hard-to-spot problems - if not, why would you sell out? I saw a post on here recently that talked about the passion that founders feel for their businesses, and the advantage of a founder remaining involved. I completely agree, and for someone to sell their business, usually in return for shares, despite the passion and natural affection they feel for their business surely suggests that the acquiring company were generous. The other thing that baffles me is how you can go on an acquisition spree and successfully integrate all these businesses. The word always used with acquisitions is "synergy", but from personal experience, if you employ a new staff member, and ask a current staff member to move to another desk 10 metres away to create room, you quickly learn a lot about synergy. Now, if you acquire a 1000 employee business that is involved in a similar business to your current one, the amount of chair changing must be massive. There must surely be fights for jobs, insecurity about whether a job will still exist, and an incredible amount of extra administration work. Add in name changes, changes in routine and procedure, possible conflicts of interest etc, and customers can quickly get peeved off. Im not against acquisitions - expansion must occur somehow, and sometimes its cheaper to buy than create. But when you look past the share prices and bold statements, I really do wonder what life is like at a company like Solution 6. Just my opinion, feel free to shoot me.. Cheers, Phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sharechat.co.nz/ New Zealand's home for market investors To remove yourself from this list, please us the form at http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.html.
References
|