|
Printable version |
From: | "Jonathan James Wall" <jwall@nznet.gen.nz> |
Date: | Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:41:34 +1200 |
Given that the new CEO of BIL was the CEO of an Investment
Bank, and given that his background, it would appear that from the company's
viewpoint the buyback is a good one. On the one hand BIL gets to buy back is
shares at a cost lower than the asset value. In regards to the shareholders out
there, it is both a good decision. The value of BIL shares will increase, as the
number of remaining shares will fall. (i.e. NTA will increase by an amount equal
to current assests / current shares x 1.00 / (1.00 + % total shares that buyback
is equal to). Sorry if this sounds a bit mathsy, but it will increase the
shareholders ownership. So good on that part.
In my view. It is a good thing; BIL can reduce its total
shareholdings, and theirby increase its NTA. Perhaps they should have got
an Investment Banker / Merchant Banker type involved long ago. Or someone that
new what they were doing.
On the whole, BIL may be on the rise, however the market still
discounts pure investment vehicles, and it will be a while to see if BIL,
and / or others, can change the markets view of it.
Jonathan Wall
|
References
|