|
Printable version |
From: | tonysw <tonysw@xtra.co.nz> |
Date: | Thu, 05 Aug 1999 14:23:59 +1200 |
DALE CRAIG HENDERSON wrote: > > I was wondering what reasons you have for suggesting to stay clear of Aquaria >21? > > >>> "jock pang" <jock.pang@xtra.co.nz> 08/05/99 01:55 >>> > I suggest you stay clear of this. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Phyllis Taylor <phyl@clear.net.nz> > To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz> > Date: Wednesday, 4 August 1999 06:31 > Subject: Re: [sharechat] Auaria 21 > > > I am hanging in - A member of STANZ sent me a list of "rich" people with >their portfolios (or part thereof) and most had a biiiiiig holding in >Aquaria!!! including the latest NZ icon who owns racehorses and a >beauuuuuuuuuuutiful girldfriend. I dont want the horses or the g/f!!! Phyl > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alastair Bax > To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 10:21 AM > Subject: [sharechat] Auaria 21 > > > Does anybody know much about Aquaria 21. In particular has the CEO >got a track record? It looks like a good punt to me > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To remove yourself from this list, email sharechat-request@sharechat.co.nz > with "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. Its all very well to view the "rich" lists investments - but once its written down, is'nt it too late for "the rest". The horse has bolted, they are far ahead of us on this one, and its obvious they get in first with any news - just crumbs for us?????Certainly not my pick! Boris -------------------------------------------------------------------------- To remove yourself from this list, email sharechat-request@sharechat.co.nz with "unsubscribe" in the body of the message.
References
|